Moon Beever Logo


In Game Retail Limited v Laws UKEAT0188/14, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered whether the dismissal of an employee for tweeting offensive comments was unfair.

L was employed by Game Retail as a risk and loss prevention investigator, with responsibility for approximately 100 stores. He set up a personal Twitter account and began to follow these stores for work purposes. He was followed in return by 65 stores.

L posted several offensive tweets on his account which were reported to Game Retail. Game Retail dismissed L for gross misconduct.

The Employment Tribunal held that the dismissal was unfair because the tweets were private. On appeal, the EAT observed that although the tweets were from L’s private account, they were publicly visible and the account was followed by fellow employees and customers. It did not matter that the comments did not refer to Game Retail or identify L as an employee of that company.

The EAT remitted the case to a newly constituted ET to reconsider the fairness of the dismissal.

Sarah Rushton (

This is intended for general information only and should not be considered as giving advice in relation to any individual case nor be taken as applying to any particular case. No liability is accepted for any such use of the information contained.



Standout firm known for its personal insolvency work for clients including private companies, individuals and governmental institutions. Frequently acts for insolvency practitioners, assisting with the realisation of assets, both in the UK and abroad.

Chambers and Partners

Contact Us

Our office locations can be found here and individual staff profiles here together with full address and contact details. 

For non-urgent enquiries by email, please complete the contact form below and we will respond as soon as possible.